From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19929 invoked by alias); 18 Aug 2009 07:19:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 19920 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Aug 2009 07:19:03 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from port-185.xxx.th.newnet.co.uk (HELO mail.codeplay.com) (80.175.148.185) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 07:18:57 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.68] (c-1769e155.77-6-64736c14.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se [85.225.105.23]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.codeplay.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id n7I7Ikg1002974 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 18 Aug 2009 08:18:49 +0100 Message-ID: <4A8A55D0.1000402@codeplay.com> Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 12:26:00 -0000 From: George Russell User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ulrich Weigand CC: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Cell SDK GDB versus GNU GDB References: <200908171847.n7HIlDgR000786@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <200908171847.n7HIlDgR000786@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-08/txt/msg00158.txt.bz2 Ulrich Weigand wrote: > If you do not specifically depend on either of those features, current > GDB mainline should work fine on Cell. If you have any problems getting > it to work, please let me know ... > > Hi, Thanks for that helpful information! I have one more question. By current GDB mainline, do you mean the gdb from CVS, or a released stable version e.g. 6.8 from March, 2008? Thanks, George Russell