From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15379 invoked by alias); 16 Aug 2009 16:52:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 15361 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Aug 2009 16:52:26 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-fx0-f219.google.com (HELO mail-fx0-f219.google.com) (209.85.220.219) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 16 Aug 2009 16:52:22 +0000 Received: by fxm19 with SMTP id 19so2178736fxm.26 for ; Sun, 16 Aug 2009 09:52:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.3.19 with SMTP id 19mr2125675bkl.151.1250441539229; Sun, 16 Aug 2009 09:52:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scientist-2.local ([85.93.118.17]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 21sm4149520fks.39.2009.08.16.09.52.17 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 16 Aug 2009 09:52:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A88395D.803@gnu.org> Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 16:52:00 -0000 From: Paolo Bonzini User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Macintosh/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: gmane.comp.gnu.binutils,gmane.comp.gcc.patches To: Ralf Wildenhues , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, binutils@sourceware.org, gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: sync toplevel between GCC and src References: <20090816150957.GA24096@gmx.de> <20090816151338.GB24096@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <20090816151338.GB24096@gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-08/txt/msg00127.txt.bz2 > ** adding target-newlib to noconfigdirs for powerpc-*-aix* and > rs6000-*-aix*, This puzzles me. > ** adding target-libgloss to noconfigdirs for sh*-*-elf, This is okay. > - the files move from GPLv2 to GPLv3 header. Is that a problem for > anything in src? I honestly don't know. > - in Makefile.tpl, there are new settings for CXX and CXX_FOR_BUILD in > POSTSTAGE1_HOST_EXPORTS, that might be responsible for > , and I would hate > to just propagate this bug to src if it can be avoided. This is not a problem since bootstraps are only done when combining the gcc and src trees (and gcc always wins). Paolo