From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1552 invoked by alias); 30 Jun 2009 03:26:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 1540 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Jun 2009 03:26:08 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,MISSING_HEADERS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.windriver.com (HELO mail.wrs.com) (147.11.1.11) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 03:24:44 +0000 Received: from ALA-MAIL03.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-mail03 [147.11.57.144]) by mail.wrs.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id n5U3OgKt022306 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:24:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ala-mail06.corp.ad.wrs.com ([147.11.57.147]) by ALA-MAIL03.corp.ad.wrs.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:24:41 -0700 Received: from [147.11.233.9] ([147.11.233.9]) by ala-mail06.corp.ad.wrs.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:24:41 -0700 Message-ID: <4A49857C.8020504@windriver.com> Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 03:26:00 -0000 From: Pawel Piech User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105) MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: -stack-list-locals and children References: <629542d40906281203o3601025at573704e36ee80565@mail.gmail.com> <200906290943.17323.andre.poenitz@nokia.com> <19016.30632.619762.345807@totara.tehura.co.nz> <4A48DEF3.3070407@windriver.com> <19017.17441.798047.264363@totara.tehura.co.nz> <4A49492E.6020406@windriver.com> In-Reply-To: <4A49492E.6020406@windriver.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00323.txt.bz2 Pawel Piech wrote: > Thank you, this is very helpful. -Pawel > > Nick Roberts wrote: >> >> [-stack-list-arguments] >> >> I think it would be quite easy to change -stack-list-arguments to accept >> --no-values, --simple-values and --all-values if people want it. BTW, I don't think the verbose option names are needed. It is supposed to be a "machine interface" after all... Cheers, Pawel