From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-34358-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 30011 invoked by alias); 8 May 2009 17:32:16 -0000
Received: (qmail 30001 invoked by uid 22791); 8 May 2009 17:32:15 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com (HELO smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com) (65.115.85.73)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 May 2009 17:32:09 +0000
Received: from mailhost4.vmware.com (mailhost4.vmware.com [10.16.67.124]) 	by smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86FDA1F007; 	Fri,  8 May 2009 10:32:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.94.141] (msnyder-server.eng.vmware.com [10.20.94.141]) 	by mailhost4.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77FB5C9DD0; 	Fri,  8 May 2009 10:32:05 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4A046A78.7040607@vmware.com>
Date: Fri, 08 May 2009 17:32:00 -0000
From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20080411)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
CC: "msnyder@sonic.net" <msnyder@sonic.net>,   "gdb@sourceware.org" <gdb@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: Can we make a gdb snapshot that includes process record?
References: <44c856fc2b3dde62e415389e6ccb12a3.squirrel@webmail.sonic.net> <20090508155922.GI675@adacore.com>
In-Reply-To: <20090508155922.GI675@adacore.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-05/txt/msg00044.txt.bz2

Joel Brobecker wrote:
>> And by the way -- any idea why the last two gdb snapshots (both made
>> in May 2009) don't seem to include process record?
> 
> I see a snapshot that was made on May 8: gdb-6.8.50.20090508.tar.bz2.
> Doesn't it include process record?

No, it doesn't.  I'm kind of mystified as to why.
The changelog only goes up to 04/22.


> Perhaps we could isolate a snapshot of your choice and add a news entry
> on the website?

Anything current (this week) should do nicely, I would think...