From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22126 invoked by alias); 3 Apr 2009 22:00:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 22104 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Apr 2009 22:00:09 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com (HELO smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com) (65.115.85.73) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 22:00:03 +0000 Received: from mailhost5.vmware.com (mailhost5.vmware.com [10.16.68.131]) by smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11CA119003; Fri, 3 Apr 2009 15:00:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.20.94.141] (msnyder-server.eng.vmware.com [10.20.94.141]) by mailhost5.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ADB8DC0CE; Fri, 3 Apr 2009 15:00:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <49D68640.1090100@vmware.com> Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2009 22:03:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20080411) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Shrinand Javadekar CC: Pedro Alves , "gdb@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: About "process 42000" References: <49D64E5A.6020604@vmware.com> <200904031915.47714.pedro@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg00043.txt.bz2 Shrinand Javadekar wrote: > Ooops... I think this was because of my mistake. I have my own gdb > server. In the list of processes being returned for "info threads", I > was returning a process with pid 0. Gdb would then give this a process > id of 42000. > > Sending packet: $qsThreadInfo#c8...Ack > Packet received: m0 > [New process 42000] > > Gdb then shows "process 42000" in the output. However, from here on, > it does not try to find out if this process is alive. It will always > show "process 42000" in the output. So every "info threads" command > after this one will have "process 42000" in the output. > > Thank you everyone. > -Shri Yep, seems like a false alarm, Pedro. Sorry! ;-)