From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22909 invoked by alias); 20 Mar 2009 15:08:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 22507 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Mar 2009 15:08:57 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,J_CHICKENPOX_93 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from eu1sys200aog109.obsmtp.com (HELO eu1sys200aog109.obsmtp.com) (207.126.144.127) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Mar 2009 15:08:51 +0000 Received: from source ([164.129.1.35]) (using TLSv1) by eu1sys200aob109.postini.com ([207.126.147.11]) with SMTP ID DSNKScOxf75lNGDBUC//qUHZGo4TJ+r7XTPy@postini.com; Fri, 20 Mar 2009 15:08:50 UTC Received: from zeta.dmz-eu.st.com (ns2.st.com [164.129.230.9]) by beta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id 88188DA7B for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2009 15:07:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail2.gnb.st.com (mail2.gnb.st.com [164.129.119.59]) by zeta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id 286624C4E8 for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2009 15:08:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [164.129.122.46] (gnx2504.gnb.st.com [164.129.122.46]) by mail2.gnb.st.com (MOS 3.8.7a) with ESMTP id DAZ57772 (AUTH lyon); Fri, 20 Mar 2009 16:09:42 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <49C3B17C.9030200@st.com> Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 15:08:00 -0000 From: Christophe LYON User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Decimal128, printcmds.exp, dfp-exprs.exp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-03/txt/msg00130.txt.bz2 Hi all, On one of our internal targets, I observe some failures in the GDB testsuite in printcmds.exp and dfp-exprs.exp tests. The failures in printcmds.exp occur only when the target is configured as big-endian, while endianness has no influence on the failure in dfp-exprs.exp. More precisely, * in dfp-exprs.exp: p (_Decimal128) 3.7df $89 = 2.00000000000000000000000800002422E+257 (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/dfp-exprs.exp: p (_Decimal128) 3.7df * in printcmds.exp: printf "%DDf\n",1.234567890123456789012345678901234dl 1.234567890123454789012345678901234 (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/printcmds.exp: printf "%DDf\n",1.234567890123456789012345678901234dl My understanding is that none of these tests uses the underlying target, so what can make them fail? Thanks, Christophe.