From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20721 invoked by alias); 2 Feb 2009 06:08:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 20713 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Feb 2009 06:08:30 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 06:08:24 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D2BA2A96C8; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 01:08:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id O0p6+Zc7fICg; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 01:08:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (nile.gnat.com [205.232.38.5]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E20092A9696; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 01:08:22 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <49868DCC.5070400@adacore.com> Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 06:08:00 -0000 From: Robert Dewar User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Evans , gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: i386 int3 handling, running vs stepping References: <20090201231819.A9FB61C7A19@localhost> <20090201233251.GA27142@caradoc.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20090201233251.GA27142@caradoc.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-02/txt/msg00006.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > I can't see a plausible way around this, can you? The SIGTRAP is > identical to the one for PTRACE_SINGLESTEP - unless the kernel > annotates the siginfo differently? same trap, but surely gdb has enough info to figure out the difference?