From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11868 invoked by alias); 20 Jan 2009 11:25:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 11835 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Jan 2009 11:25:28 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.4) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 11:25:24 +0000 Received: (qmail 16616 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2009 11:25:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.44.101?) (nathan@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 20 Jan 2009 11:25:22 -0000 Message-ID: <4975B4A9.1090808@codesourcery.com> Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 11:25:00 -0000 From: Nathan Sidwell User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Brobecker CC: gdb@sourceware.org, Pedro Alves Subject: Re: Discussing the next GDB release (GDB 7.0?) References: <20090115034552.GF24105@adacore.com> <4975869C.4070507@codesourcery.com> <20090120104135.GL5709@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <20090120104135.GL5709@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-01/txt/msg00115.txt.bz2 Joel Brobecker wrote: >> What about merging the multiprocess bits from the multiprocess branch? >> If we're going for a major version increment, might as well have as >> many new features as possible :) > > That's an interesting feature to have - I would love to have it, as > any new feature, but can this be pushed to trunk in a reasonable > amount of time? Otherwise, the question becomes: Do we want to delay > the release for this feature? What are the limitations in the current > implementation? Pedro has a much better handle on the state of that branch than me. > Right now, I am guestimating we're two to three months away from branching. > I need to discuss this delay with the Python guys too... I planned to have CodeSourcery work on getting that branch merged by the end of April. Hitting the beginning of April is probably too soon. Please let me know if there's more we can do to get multi-process into GDB 7 nathan -- Nathan Sidwell :: http://www.codesourcery.com :: CodeSourcery