From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18837 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2009 10:20:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 18829 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Jan 2009 10:20:37 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from eu1sys200aog107.obsmtp.com (HELO eu1sys200aog107.obsmtp.com) (207.126.144.123) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 10:19:51 +0000 Received: from source ([164.129.1.35]) (using TLSv1) by eu1sys200aob107.postini.com ([207.126.147.11]) with SMTP ID DSNKSXBfQ5zK/yTD8M+/gh1Req6FrJOWmVIM@postini.com; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 10:19:50 UTC Received: from zeta.dmz-eu.st.com (ns2.st.com [164.129.230.9]) by beta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id C415BDAAA for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 10:19:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail2.gnb.st.com (mail2.gnb.st.com [164.129.119.59]) by zeta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id E98694BFF4 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 10:19:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [164.129.122.46] (gnx2504.gnb.st.com [164.129.122.46]) by mail2.gnb.st.com (MOS 3.8.7a) with ESMTP id CZJ34045 (AUTH lyon); Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:20:14 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <49705F42.5080609@st.com> Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 10:20:00 -0000 From: Christophe LYON User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: gdb.cp/templates.exp, ctor/dtor breakpoints, etc.... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-01/txt/msg00091.txt.bz2 Hello, While trying to improve my Open64/Gcc-3-3-3 based compiler results on the gdb-6.8 testsuite, I noticed on gdb.cp/templates.exp that even on x86/GCC-4.1.x there are still several KFAIL tests dating back to 2003. In particular, there are issues when setting breakpoints on ctor/dtor. I thought that the recent support for multiple breakpoints would fix this, so I am a bit surprised. Could someone give me some updated status in this area: should the tests be revisited, or is it GDB itself that should be fixed, or GCC? Thanks, Christophe.