From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-33212-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 8164 invoked by alias); 28 Oct 2008 18:06:23 -0000
Received: (qmail 8140 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Oct 2008 18:06:22 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com (HELO smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com) (65.115.85.73)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:05:46 +0000
Received: from mailhost3.vmware.com (mailhost3.vmware.com [10.16.27.45]) 	by smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C59E4800E; 	Tue, 28 Oct 2008 11:05:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.92.59] (promb-2s-dhcp59.eng.vmware.com [10.20.92.59]) 	by mailhost3.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9165FC9A3F; 	Tue, 28 Oct 2008 11:05:41 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4907531A.7040805@vmware.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:06:00 -0000
From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20080411)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9_P=F6nitz?= <apoenitz@trolltech.com>
CC: "gdb@sourceware.org" <gdb@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [bug] problem printing local vars in shared lib function
References: <490648CE.4090709@vmware.com> <200810280907.49029.apoenitz@trolltech.com>
In-Reply-To: <200810280907.49029.apoenitz@trolltech.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-10/txt/msg00123.txt.bz2

André Pönitz wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 October 2008 00:03:42 Michael Snyder wrote:
>> Does this sound familiar to anybody?  X86_64...
>>
>> I have a local shared library function, built with -g,
>> gdb has its symbols and can list it, step into it, step
>> within it etc.
>>
>> I can print the values of the function parameters, but
>> not the values of local (automatic) variables.  These
>> are not statics but autos on the stack.
> 
> Is this function a constructor?
> 
> If so, it sounds familiar ;-}

No, I don't think so, I believe it was an ordinary
function, and in fact I think the problem was demonstrated
to me in several different shlib functions.