From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28424 invoked by alias); 5 Aug 2008 19:25:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 28388 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Aug 2008 19:25:03 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 19:24:27 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m75JOODO014002 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2008 15:24:25 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [10.11.255.20]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m75JONw3024782 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2008 15:24:23 -0400 Received: from lindt.uglyboxes.com (sebastian-int.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.221]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m75JOATO017583 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2008 15:24:16 -0400 Message-ID: <4898A8D4.2040100@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 19:25:00 -0000 From: Keith Seitz User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Quoting and the expr parser Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-08/txt/msg00078.txt.bz2 Hi, I have a simple question: Why must one type "my_class::'operator+'" instead of simply "my_class::operator+"? *Should* gdb accept the latter; after all, it's not ambiguous (assuming it's not overloaded). Keith