From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12832 invoked by alias); 17 Jul 2008 23:35:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 12824 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Jul 2008 23:35:26 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nskntmtas03p.mx.bigpond.com (HELO nskntmtas03p.mx.bigpond.com) (61.9.168.143) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 23:35:07 +0000 Received: from nskntotgx03p.mx.bigpond.com ([58.172.128.171]) by nskntmtas03p.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20080717233504.CQRI17781.nskntmtas03p.mx.bigpond.com@nskntotgx03p.mx.bigpond.com>; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 23:35:04 +0000 Received: from kiwi.contemporary.net.au ([58.172.128.171]) by nskntotgx03p.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20080717233503.GYTJ2630.nskntotgx03p.mx.bigpond.com@kiwi.contemporary.net.au>; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 23:35:03 +0000 Received: from [172.16.100.186] (kaka.contemporary.net.au [172.16.100.186]) by kiwi.contemporary.net.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6HNZ1el011488; Fri, 18 Jul 2008 09:35:02 +1000 Message-ID: <487FD725.1040002@contemporary.net.au> Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 23:35:00 -0000 From: Chris Johns User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bart Veer , gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: proposed extension for jtag debugging References: <20080717215720.GA1061@caradoc.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20080717215720.GA1061@caradoc.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Status: Clean X-RPD-ScanID: Class unknown; VirusThreatLevel unknown, RefID str=0001.0A150204.487FD727.00AC,ss=1,fgs=0 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-07/txt/msg00198.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > It's sad that you need to use the target strata for this. Doing it > directly in the remote target would work for all of the above except > for "target bdm". But I suppose it's reasonable. > I would not worry about "target bdm". This project has moved away from a patch for GDB adding the bdm target to a gdbserver and the remote protocol. Regards Chris