From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18927 invoked by alias); 10 May 2008 05:30:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 18919 invoked by uid 22791); 10 May 2008 05:30:59 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from hel.is.scarlet.be (HELO hel.is.scarlet.be) (193.74.71.26) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 10 May 2008 05:30:39 +0000 Received: from [192.168.123.145] (ip-83-134-136-19.dsl.scarlet.be [83.134.136.19]) (authenticated bits=0) by hel.is.scarlet.be (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m4A5UV31031400; Sat, 10 May 2008 07:30:32 +0200 Message-ID: <4825331B.9030804@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 10 May 2008 05:30:00 -0000 From: Geert Vancompernolle User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: drow@false.org CC: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: GDB for target mips2_fp_le References: <4821F173.2040208@gmail.com> <20080507181842.GA8592@caradoc.them.org> <20080509120246.GA23419@caradoc.them.org> <20080509133052.GA28235@caradoc.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20080509133052.GA28235@caradoc.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-DCC-scarlet.be-Metrics: hel 20001; Body=3 Fuz1=3 Fuz2=3 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-05/txt/msg00088.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > If you are getting that message then you are using mips-elf, not > mips-linux. Apologize, I've misinterpret your previous answers. I was not aware there was a target called "mips-linux", as you indicated. What I find a bit confusing (but that's most probably Insight related, not GDB), is that "./config.sub mips" is not giving me all the possible options. I only got "mips-unknown-elf" as feedback, while there are many more possibilities (I've even seen mipsle in the configure script). AFAIK, "config.sub" is giving you (or should give you) all the possible options for a (part of a) string that you're giving as an argument. But apparently that's not always true. Hence, my confusion. But it's clear now. Thanks anyhow for your patience. Best rgds, --Geert