From: Chris Johns <chrisj@rtems.org>
To: Paul Koning <Paul_Koning@dell.com>
Cc: drow@false.org, gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Can back trace be stopped from always prints "char*" strings ?
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 18:13:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47D8A5D7.6020608@rtems.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18391.57812.944766.963990@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Paul Koning wrote:
>>>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> writes:
>
> Daniel> On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 08:13:51PM +1100, Chris Johns wrote:
> >> Is there a way to stop the bt accessing the char* data and just
> >> printing the pointer value ?
>
> Daniel> I don't think there is. You might want to look at "set mem
> Daniel> inaccessible-by-default" and the "mem" command; that's good
> Daniel> for preventing stray memory reads.
>
This is working so I am able to move forward. Thanks. I wonder if it is such a
good idea for GDB to display the string a char* points to by default when
handling a union.
> Another possibility: if the embedded target dies when this happens,
> that may mean it's getting an addressing error and not handling that.
> The target stub should validate addresses it's given and reject any
> that are out of range. It also would make sense for it to intercept
> any access errors that make it past those range checks and turn them
> into error messages back to gdb instead.
This may work for a stub running on the target. I have a gdbserver talking
over USB to a BDM pod connected to a Coldfire. The gdbserver knows nothing
about the target memory map and I am not sure it should need to know. I think
the mem command is a good idea. Thank for the idea.
Regards
Chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-13 3:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-12 11:50 Chris Johns
2008-03-12 14:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-03-12 14:23 ` Paul Koning
2008-03-13 18:13 ` Chris Johns [this message]
2008-03-12 15:05 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2008-03-12 20:15 ` Michael Snyder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47D8A5D7.6020608@rtems.org \
--to=chrisj@rtems.org \
--cc=Paul_Koning@dell.com \
--cc=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox