From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23783 invoked by alias); 29 Feb 2008 18:22:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 23773 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Feb 2008 18:22:20 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from qnxmail.qnx.com (HELO qnxmail.qnx.com) (209.226.137.76) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 18:22:03 +0000 Received: from smtp.ott.qnx.com (smtp.ott.qnx.com [10.42.96.5]) by hub.ott.qnx.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA26058 for ; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:04:58 -0500 Received: from [10.42.100.129] (dhcp-100-129 [10.42.100.129]) by smtp.ott.qnx.com (8.8.8/8.6.12) with ESMTP id NAA10107 for ; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:22:00 -0500 Message-ID: <47C84D48.2020807@qnx.com> Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 18:39:00 -0000 From: Aleksandar Ristovski User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: cp-name-parser.y Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-02/txt/msg00260.txt.bz2 Hello, Is it just me or is cpname_parse really not being used at all? I see there has been some effort put into parsing c++ specific sutff, but is it unfinished, or what is going on? If you could, let me know how mature is that code there and can it be used. Thanks, Aleksandar Ristovski QNX Software Systems