From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6342 invoked by alias); 23 Feb 2008 16:03:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 6331 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Feb 2008 16:03:57 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp5.poczta.onet.pl (HELO smtp5.poczta.onet.pl) (213.180.130.32) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 16:03:31 +0000 Received: from host8925149113.waldex.net ([89.25.149.113]:3026 "EHLO [89.25.149.113]" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by ps5.test.onet.pl with ESMTPSA id S738200321AbYBWQD1zyTUw (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Feb 2008 17:03:27 +0100 Message-ID: <47C04460.9050505@op.pl> Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:08:00 -0000 From: Bogdan Slusarczyk User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Multiple breakpoints - few problems [MI commands, gdb6.7.50.20080221] References: <47BEB1E2.5070309@op.pl> <47C01343.9040801@op.pl> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-02/txt/msg00206.txt.bz2 >> Regardless of this, don't you think it's good idea to adapt MI commands >> for breakpoints? Do you consider it? > > Of, course, it will be good. Unfortunately, at this point it's not the > biggest problem with MI, in my opinion, so I don't have an estimate when > I'll have time to address this. I hope it will be sooner than later :) I will be very happy with it ;) Thanks for help. Best regards, Bogdan