From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1669 invoked by alias); 28 Jan 2008 12:41:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 1658 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Jan 2008 12:41:01 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com (HELO fk-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.128.187) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 12:40:41 +0000 Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 26so1149004fkx.8 for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 04:40:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.83.15 with SMTP id g15mr7111964hub.6.1201524037937; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 04:40:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.0.101? ( [85.240.245.95]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p10sm7062779gvf.8.2008.01.28.04.40.35 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 28 Jan 2008 04:40:36 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <479DCD42.5060207@portugalmail.pt> Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 12:41:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.13pre) Gecko/20071023 Thunderbird/1.5.0.14pre Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Brobecker CC: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Our next GDB release (GDB version 6.8) References: <20080126005319.GD21874@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <20080126005319.GD21874@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg00284.txt.bz2 Joel Brobecker wrote: > Opinions? Items that should be put on the list of things to finish > for the release? Please send them here and I'll add them to the > wiki. If a thread was already started, please post a link to it > as well. > I'd like to have gdbserver building on Windows CE again. The remote file transfer file support added a dependency on errno (*) that's a no-no for Windows CE. I'd like this discussed before the release because it may require a small protocol change. I'll start a thread on this later tonight. (*) - Yes, Windows CE's runtime has no errno ... -- Pedro Alves