From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10145 invoked by alias); 13 Oct 2007 22:52:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 10137 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Oct 2007 22:51:59 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (HELO ug-out-1314.google.com) (66.249.92.174) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 13 Oct 2007 22:51:53 +0000 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so841933uge for ; Sat, 13 Oct 2007 15:51:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.233.14 with SMTP id f14mr5985445ugh.1192315910890; Sat, 13 Oct 2007 15:51:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?78.130.34.112? ( [78.130.34.112]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d27sm3074324nfh.2007.10.13.15.51.46 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 13 Oct 2007 15:51:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <47114BB7.1000501@portugalmail.pt> Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 22:52:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; pt-BR; rv:1.8.1.6) Gecko/20070728 Thunderbird/2.0.0.6 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Brobecker CC: Eli Zaretskii , Kai.Tietz@onevision.com, gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Support of gdb for Windows 64 native systems References: <20071012161132.GE4044@adacore.com> <20071012174218.GH4044@adacore.com> <20071012222842.GD21800@adacore.com> <20071013024116.GB29152@adacore.com> <20071013154715.GE29152@adacore.com> <4711021C.8010805@portugalmail.pt> <20071013205105.GA13789@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <20071013205105.GA13789@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-10/txt/msg00100.txt.bz2 Joel Brobecker wrote: >> I propose goind the other way around. Start by adding the needed configury >> bits needed, a mingw.mt file, and disabling the cygwin specific bits in >> win32-nat.c around #ifdef __CYGWIN__ blocks. > > That's mostly how I did it, except for the win32-nat.c changes. > I like your suggestions. I think we can get something minimal > pretty quickly. Just to avoid duplicating efforts, who's in charge? > :-) > Not sure who you're asking that, but, I'm not doing or going to do anything, since you're already about to :) Cheers, Pedro Alves