From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20892 invoked by alias); 20 Sep 2007 19:47:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 20882 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Sep 2007 19:47:50 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from igw2.br.ibm.com (HELO igw2.br.ibm.com) (32.104.18.25) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Sep 2007 19:47:39 +0000 Received: from mailhub3.br.ibm.com (mailhub3 [9.18.232.110]) by igw2.br.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3FA717F754 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2007 16:45:29 -0300 (BRT) Received: from d24av02.br.ibm.com (d24av02.br.ibm.com [9.18.232.47]) by mailhub3.br.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.5) with ESMTP id l8KJlYLW2732220 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2007 16:47:34 -0300 Received: from d24av02.br.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d24av02.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l8KJlYDv008479 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2007 16:47:34 -0300 Received: from [9.18.238.59] ([9.18.238.59]) by d24av02.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l8KJlYD5008472; Thu, 20 Sep 2007 16:47:34 -0300 Message-ID: <46F2CE45.5020308@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 20:46:00 -0000 From: Carlos Eduardo Seo User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070907) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Brobecker CC: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Problems while debugging fortran References: <46EB035B.4090802@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20070920173246.GJ16400@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <20070920173246.GJ16400@adacore.com> OpenPGP: id=8BFFA900 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-09/txt/msg00163.txt.bz2 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Joel Brobecker wrote: > > What command exactly did you use to set your breakpoint? > Did you try: > > (gdb) break test.f:3 > > ? > No, just "break ". However, I tried your command and it worked. Why? Shouldn't the behavior be the same in both cases? > > Perhaps it would be clearer if you could post annotated copies of > your various GDB sessions (the ones that work, and the ones that > don't). I think it'll be easier for us to help you. > Ok, I will. I'll post a message later with the output of my GDB sessions. > Are you using a recent snapshot from CVS? > Yes, my GDB tree is updated every day. Thanks and regards, - -- Carlos Eduardo Seo Software Engineer IBM Linux Technology Center -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFG8s5Fqvq7Aov/qQARAt8FAJ95eDk97ktPTPyWJkDPV+XJ/VW5hgCeJZ0i ZNVEKDDmmQIZRcwhtU0tKxc= =iJF4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----