From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28332 invoked by alias); 5 Aug 2007 12:03:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 28258 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Aug 2007 12:03:46 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Aug 2007 12:03:42 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DD532A9D2D for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 08:03:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id HBZKyahvqpSL for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 08:03:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (nile.gnat.com [205.232.38.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B70EB2A9D23 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 08:03:40 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <46B5BC99.2090206@adacore.com> Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 12:03:00 -0000 From: Robert Dewar User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Posting from work/university addresses References: <46B2101F.6060305@adacore.com> <20070805000352.GA11072@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <200708042355.23161.rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org> <20070805050748.GA12733@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> In-Reply-To: <20070805050748.GA12733@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-08/txt/msg00045.txt.bz2 Christopher Faylor wrote: > No one ever said that there was a concern about publishing a regex. > That is an ongoing fiction developing in this thread. The system isn't > operational now. I said I'd send out more details when it was about to > go live. It's not unheard of to publish specs before proceeding ahead with implementation and deployment :-)