From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23995 invoked by alias); 1 Jul 2007 15:43:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 23987 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Jul 2007 15:43:27 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (HELO mtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com) (81.103.221.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 Jul 2007 15:43:25 +0000 Received: from aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20070701154322.IWVX12936.mtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com> for ; Sun, 1 Jul 2007 16:43:22 +0100 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (really [82.25.98.11]) by aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20070701154322.RZAR26699.aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@[127.0.0.1]> for ; Sun, 1 Jul 2007 16:43:22 +0100 Message-ID: <4687CB97.8010304@ntlworld.com> Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2007 15:43:00 -0000 From: Dave Murphy User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (Windows/20070604) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: GDB patches for mingw host Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 000752-7, 01/07/2007), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-07/txt/msg00000.txt.bz2 Hi, I have a set of patches which allow GBB 6.6 to be built using MinGW/MSys for a mingw host which I would like to contribute for consideration. From reading through the contribution requirements it seems that I need an FSF assignment on file before submitting patches. It's not clear to me how to request the necessary paperwork, perhaps I'm just looking in the wrong place. Is it sufficient to request paperwork via the list and do I need to do this for each project I wish to submit patches for? I have some minor patches for Insight, gcc and some more extensive work I'd like the newlib maintainers to consider. Would it be preferable to create the gdb patches against CVS before submission? Dave Murphy