From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17840 invoked by alias); 25 Jun 2007 20:44:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 17831 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Jun 2007 20:44:07 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 20:44:03 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 921A42A9BE3; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 16:44:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 6MApFF+6XwFX; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 16:44:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (nile.gnat.com [205.232.38.5]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F80C2A9BD5; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 16:44:01 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <46802911.7070209@adacore.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 20:44:00 -0000 From: Robert Dewar User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Windows/20070509) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii CC: pkoning@equallogic.com, jimb@codesourcery.com, eager@eagercon.com, stanshebs@earthlink.net, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: What's an annex? stratum? References: <467D5FEF.7010900@eagercon.com> <467D6D1F.7090507@earthlink.net> <467D6FB8.4080909@eagercon.com> <468009EA.4040504@eagercon.com> <18048.5444.903092.843811@pkoning.equallogic.com> <20070625193135.GA6391@caradoc.them.org> <4680199F.7020906@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-06/txt/msg00270.txt.bz2 Eli Zaretskii wrote: > In any case, if people here believe comments are a reasonable > substitute for documentation, perhaps I should from now on reject code > patches that do not explain themselves clearly, and do not contain > enough references to other related portions of GDB. You should do that in *any* case, inadequately documented code is never acceptable.