From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19031 invoked by alias); 1 Jun 2007 09:13:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 19023 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Jun 2007 09:13:45 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp23.poczta.onet.pl (HELO smtp23.poczta.onet.pl) (213.180.130.94) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 09:13:40 +0000 Received: from static-62-233-152-148.devs.futuro.pl ([62.233.152.148]:35335 "EHLO [10.0.0.72]") by ps23.test.onet.pl with ESMTP id (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Jun 2007 11:13:28 +0200 Message-ID: <465FE337.9020704@op.pl> Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 09:13:00 -0000 From: Bogdan Slusarczyk User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vladimir Prus CC: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: tracing variables - is it ok? References: <465FD1AD.9040909@op.pl> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-06/txt/msg00003.txt.bz2 Vladimir Prus pisze: > This seems weird. Can you also print 'a' right after creating varobj, > and right after -var-update, to make sure it's the problem with > variable objects, and not with something else. Please do this test with > gdb 6.6, or better yet, with CVS version. I did -var-evaluate-expression just after creating varobj and I got proper value (testA, a=10 ). After -var-update (in testB) value is not changed. I did this test with gdb 6.6. Regards Bogdan