From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16823 invoked by alias); 3 May 2007 21:44:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 16812 invoked by uid 22791); 3 May 2007 21:44:04 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (HELO ug-out-1314.google.com) (66.249.92.175) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 May 2007 21:44:00 +0000 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 75so468023ugb for ; Thu, 03 May 2007 14:43:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.67.101.8 with SMTP id d8mr2207311ugm.1178228635768; Thu, 03 May 2007 14:43:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?88.210.74.158? ( [88.210.74.158]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 34sm3282640uga.2007.05.03.14.43.54; Thu, 03 May 2007 14:43:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <463A5787.1070807@portugalmail.pt> Date: Thu, 03 May 2007 21:44:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; pt-BR; rv:1.8.0.10) Gecko/20070221 Thunderbird/1.5.0.10 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Win32 gdbserver dll support. References: <4053daab0704260940t4e0a9593lc706794c718cc3a9@mail.gmail.com> <4631274C.5080603@portugalmail.pt> <20070426224438.GA14312@caradoc.them.org> <463136E8.8060700@portugalmail.pt> <20070430024531.GA3880@caradoc.them.org> <20070503153703.GA20130@caradoc.them.org> <4053daab0705030911v4be55c85jcce7d0fb2d24dde0@mail.gmail.com> <20070503200844.GA727@caradoc.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20070503200844.GA727@caradoc.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-05/txt/msg00010.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > Yep. I've been moving the ELF-specific bits into elfread.c for the > last hour. For Windows this should be easy, since it looks like DLLs > are always relocated by a single offset; does Windows CE relocate text > and data by different amounts, or is there still a single image base? > Still a single image base. > Yes please. I'll try to combine all the pieces. > Sent. Many thanks for doing this. Cheers, Pedro Alves