Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxim Grigoriev <maxim@tensilica.com>
To: gdb@sourceware.org, Bob Wilson <bwilson@tensilica.com>,
	  Marc Gauthier <marc@tensilica.com>
Subject: GDB (mis)behavior depends on DWARF DW_TAG_compile_unit data
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 20:33:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45F5B929.3050406@hq.tensilica.com> (raw)

Hello members,

I would like to hear your opinion on whether what I see is a compiler problem or a GDB misbehavior.

GDB session goes wrong, if my test case is compiled using a base name as a source file. Everything is fine, when an absolute path name is used instead. I checked several compilers ( all GCCs ). They seem to be consistent in generating DWARF DW_TAG_compile_unit information in this case.

Anyway, even if GDB treats this situation as a bad DWARF data it doesn't look decent to output misleading error messages, like 'No line 6 in file "test.c".', when there actually is the line number 6, and the test case was compiled with "-g".

				* * * * *

Here come the details:

1) The GDB version is: GNU gdb 6.6.50.20070312-cvs

2) The test program is:

001: extern int printf(const char *fmt,...);
002: 
003: int main()
004: {
005:   printf("Hello, World !\n");
006:   printf("Let's make DWARF consistent across all the tools !\n");
007: }

3) It was compiled with two different command line options:

gcc -g test.c -o basename_used.exe
gcc -g /home/maxim/W/BadgerPass/FSF_QUESTION/test.c -o full_path_used.exe

4) Freshly build GDB was run with the command file CMD_FILE:

break main
break test.c:6
quit

-- Good case:
>>> gdb full_path_used.exe --command=CMD_FILE
[ . . . . . ]
Breakpoint 1 at 0x40000970: file /home/maxim/W/BadgerPass/FSF_QUESTION/test.c, line 4.
Breakpoint 2 at 0x4000097c: file /home/maxim/W/BadgerPass/FSF_QUESTION/test.c, line 6.

-- Bad case:
>>> gdb basename_used.exe --command=CMD_FILE
[ . . . . . ]
Breakpoint 1 at 0x40000970: file /home/maxim/W/BadgerPass/FSF_QUESTION/test.c, line 4.
CMD_FILE:2: Error in sourced command file:
No line 6 in file "test.c".

5) The difference in DWARF info is :

-- Good case, full_path_used.exe:
[ . . . . ]
 <0><c3>: Abbrev Number: 1 (DW_TAG_compile_unit)
     DW_AT_name        : /home/maxim/W/BadgerPass/FSF_QUESTION/test.c	
     DW_AT_comp_dir    : /home/maxim/W/BadgerPass/FSF_QUESTION	

-- Bad case, basename_used.exe:
[ . . . . ]
<0><c3>: Abbrev Number: 1 (DW_TAG_compile_unit)
     DW_AT_name        : test.c	
     DW_AT_comp_dir    : /home/maxim/W/BadgerPass/FSF_QUESTION	

Thanks in advance for any input on this,
-- Maxim




             reply	other threads:[~2007-03-12 20:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-12 20:33 Maxim Grigoriev [this message]
2007-03-12 20:49 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-03-12 21:06   ` Maxim Grigoriev
2007-03-12 21:23     ` Joel Brobecker
2007-03-12 21:54       ` Maxim Grigoriev
2007-03-12 21:58         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-03-15  2:03           ` Maxim Grigoriev
2007-03-12 20:57 ` Bob Wilson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=45F5B929.3050406@hq.tensilica.com \
    --to=maxim@tensilica.com \
    --cc=bwilson@tensilica.com \
    --cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
    --cc=marc@tensilica.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox