From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-27708-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 30243 invoked by alias); 12 Feb 2007 21:59:09 -0000
Received: (qmail 30235 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Feb 2007 21:59:09 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from de01egw02.freescale.net (HELO de01egw02.freescale.net) (192.88.165.103)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Feb 2007 21:59:02 +0000
Received: from de01smr02.am.mot.com (de01smr02.freescale.net [10.208.0.151]) 	by de01egw02.freescale.net (8.12.11/de01egw02) with ESMTP id l1CLwwLG007970; 	Mon, 12 Feb 2007 14:58:58 -0700 (MST)
Received: from [10.82.23.23] (ld0034-tx32.am.freescale.net [10.82.23.23]) 	by de01smr02.am.mot.com (8.13.1/8.13.0) with ESMTP id l1CLwskj016744; 	Mon, 12 Feb 2007 15:58:58 -0600 (CST)
Message-ID: <45D0E31E.8030802@freescale.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 22:07:00 -0000
From: Kishore Paul <kishorep@freescale.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
CC: gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: vCont packets for next and step
References: <45D0DDDA.301@freescale.com> <20070212214040.GA23093@caradoc.them.org>
In-Reply-To: <20070212214040.GA23093@caradoc.them.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-02/txt/msg00092.txt.bz2

Should the gdb host not be sending multiple vCont step packets for next, 
just like it does for step?

Thanks,
Kishore

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

>On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 03:36:26PM -0600, Kishore Paul wrote:
>  
>
>>Hi All,
>>
>>How does the gdb next and step work? I am seeing a problem where next 
>>only sends one vCont packet, similar to stepi though I was expecting a 
>>set of vCont packets to be sent similar to a step.
>>    
>>
>
>That means that, after the single stepi, the "next" thinks it has
>reached a different source line.  So it stops.
>
>  
>