From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3002 invoked by alias); 10 Feb 2007 21:42:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 2989 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Feb 2007 21:42:10 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from elrond.portugalmail.pt (HELO elrond.portugalmail.pt) (195.245.179.181) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 10 Feb 2007 21:42:05 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elrond.portugalmail.pt (Postfix) with ESMTP id 036A7281CD; Sat, 10 Feb 2007 21:42:00 +0000 (WET) Received: from elrond.portugalmail.pt ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (elrond.portugalmail.pt [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rZITTzGX6h9M; Sat, 10 Feb 2007 21:41:59 +0000 (WET) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (62.169.106.232.rev.optimus.pt [62.169.106.232]) (Authenticated sender: pedro_alves@portugalmail.pt) by elrond.portugalmail.pt (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6A5C2810B; Sat, 10 Feb 2007 21:41:50 +0000 (WET) Message-ID: <45CE3C17.8080802@portugalmail.pt> Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 21:42:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; pt-BR; rv:1.8.0.9) Gecko/20061207 Thunderbird/1.5.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dave.anglin@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca, Mark Kettenis , brobecker@adacore.com, gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Likely obsolete pieces of GDB References: <20061216205923.GA21428@nevyn.them.org> <20061216212254.GA14335@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> In-Reply-To: <20061216212254.GA14335@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 000712-3, 10-02-2007), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-02/txt/msg00072.txt.bz2 Christopher Faylor escreveu: > On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 03:59:23PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: >> wince-stub.c >> wince-stub.h >> wince.c >> >> For Windows CE devices. Pedro Alves breathed some life >> back into these in June, but Chris Faylor rejected the >> patch (with which I completely agree). It's a Windows-specific >> remote protocol, and should use the GDB remote protocol >> instead. >> >> And now there's a Windows gdbserver as a start to that. >> I think these files should be removed. > > And, it should come as no surprise that I agree and I apologize > for introducing this misbegotten code into gdb to begin with. > (Sorry for taking such a long time to reply to this, I was internet-less for a month.) Looking at my patch now, I now fully agree with the rejection. Thank you for rejecting it. :) I have the WinCE gdbserver port 99% ready for submission. There are just a few other things I would like to solve first: is the target name that I have been calling arm-wince-mingw32ce at cegcc.sourceforge.net ok, or should I rename it?; Some cleanups at the mingw32ce side, that are needed for the gdbserver; Submit a few gdb fixes that are either global or PE related. Removing the current wince support now, means that I will have to add a few things back again later (mostly autoconf stuff, and the target header), but there's no problem with me, if it is wanted. Else, I will remove them with the gdbserver port. Cheers, Pedro Alves