From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24460 invoked by alias); 11 Jan 2007 14:56:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 24451 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Jan 2007 14:56:48 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nile.gnat.com (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:56:41 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B93F48CDDF; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:56:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from nile.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nile.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 13966-01-6; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:56:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (nile.gnat.com [205.232.38.5]) by nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29D8C48CDCA; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:56:38 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <45A65027.2070509@adacore.com> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:56:00 -0000 From: Robert Dewar User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Koning CC: bob_rossi@cox.net, jimb@codesourcery.com, gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: GDB and scripting languages - which References: <20070108222005.GA27451@nevyn.them.org> <20070109202343.GD9844@cox.net> <17828.2852.359000.383405@gargle.gargle.HOWL> In-Reply-To: <17828.2852.359000.383405@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-01/txt/msg00190.txt.bz2 Paul Koning wrote: > I would think it's good to stay away from TCL. I won't say more > because I don't want to start a language war. Python can certainly be > scripted, and it has good support for testsuite type things. I agree that avoiding TCL is a good idea. In my experience, TCL has proved hard to maintain.