From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29478 invoked by alias); 9 Jan 2007 14:43:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 29467 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Jan 2007 14:43:29 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtagate5.de.ibm.com (HELO mtagate5.de.ibm.com) (195.212.29.154) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 14:43:23 +0000 Received: from d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.167.49]) by mtagate5.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l09EhKWB206750 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:43:20 GMT Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.165.228]) by d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/NCO v8.1.1) with ESMTP id l09EhJQl2416824 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:43:19 +0100 Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l09EhJ9u002885 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:43:19 +0100 Received: from [9.152.248.39] (dyn-9-152-248-39.boeblingen.de.ibm.com [9.152.248.39]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l09EhJvD002882; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:43:19 +0100 Message-ID: <45A3AA04.10505@de.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 14:43:00 -0000 From: Markus Deuling User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070102) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz , GDB Discuss , mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl Subject: Re: Difference between infptrace and inf-ptrace References: <45A372C5.6020700@de.ibm.com> <20070109134343.GB16313@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20070109134343.GB16313@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-01/txt/msg00143.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz schrieb: > You're right, infptrace.c is the older one. The interfaces are very > different - to move from one to the other you really have to be able to > test the changed config. Your grep was a little too simple; if you > take a look at the grep results, you'll see that only a handful of > configs still use infptrace.c: alpha-osf, i386-sco, powerpc-aix, > rs6000-lynxos. The SCO and LynxOS configurations are going to be > deleted soon but someone needs to update alpha-osf and powerpc-aix > eventually. > Thank you Mark and Daniel, I'll look at inf-ptrace then :-) I think there are some more of these "construction areas". Is there somewhere a list of them? What I have in mind is a kind of "project plan"? Maybe that would be an interesting point for the wiki for someone that has a good overview about the current work on gdb. Regards, Markus -- Markus Deuling GNU Toolchain for Linux on Cell BE deuling@de.ibm.com