From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17017 invoked by alias); 5 Jan 2007 03:39:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 17009 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Jan 2007 03:39:28 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from fed1rmmtao07.cox.net (HELO fed1rmmtao07.cox.net) (68.230.241.32) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Jan 2007 03:39:21 +0000 Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao07.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.03 201-2131-130-104-20060516) with ESMTP id <20070105033919.XMZK3976.fed1rmmtao07.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net> for ; Thu, 4 Jan 2007 22:39:19 -0500 Received: from thunderbird.smith.home ([24.56.61.172]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id 7Ffa1W00S3iyCZU0000000; Thu, 04 Jan 2007 22:39:34 -0500 Received: (qmail 17902 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2007 03:45:27 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (127.0.0.1) by thunderbird.smith.home with SMTP; 5 Jan 2007 03:45:27 -0000 Message-ID: <459DC9D4.407@cox.net> Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 03:39:00 -0000 From: Stephen & Linda Smith User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061115) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Smith, Stephen (SWCOE)" , General GDB Mailing List Subject: Re: GDB solib interface References: <20070104213959.GA30083@nevyn.them.org> <20070104214903.GA30403@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20070104214903.GA30403@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-01/txt/msg00087.txt.bz2 In the patch you sent, did you check to make sure load, unload, or dll worked? Actually I have been stairing at the debugger and can't see that any of the following work in remote_await() [file: remote.c]: watch, rwatch, load, unload, or dll. All of them would be broken because of the strncmp() check for awatch which does not check for the others. That would mean that the check for p1==p will fail. Am I missing something?