From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26749 invoked by alias); 17 Dec 2006 14:26:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 26741 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Dec 2006 14:26:17 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from fed1rmmtao08.cox.net (HELO fed1rmmtao08.cox.net) (68.230.241.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 17 Dec 2006 14:26:04 +0000 Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao08.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.03 201-2131-130-104-20060516) with ESMTP id <20061217142602.VUB16632.fed1rmmtao08.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net> for ; Sun, 17 Dec 2006 09:26:02 -0500 Received: from thunderbird.smith.home ([24.56.61.13]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id zqRN1V00C0H8Jr40000000; Sun, 17 Dec 2006 09:25:22 -0500 Received: (qmail 20167 invoked from network); 17 Dec 2006 14:29:59 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (127.0.0.1) by thunderbird.smith.home with SMTP; 17 Dec 2006 14:29:59 -0000 Message-ID: <45855465.7090706@cox.net> Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 14:26:00 -0000 From: Stephen & Linda Smith User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061115) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Kettenis , gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Likely obsolete pieces of GDB References: <20061216205923.GA21428@nevyn.them.org> <13057.82.92.89.47.1166358029.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <13057.82.92.89.47.1166358029.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-12/txt/msg00159.txt.bz2 Mark Kettenis wrote: >> gnu-v2-abi.c >> gnu-v2-abi.h >> >> C++ ABI support for GCC 2.x. >> >> I'm not sure about these. The last release of GCC they worked >> with was 2.95.3. GCC 3.0 was released Jun 18, 2001. Adoption >> was slow, but I think I can safely say that almost no one uses >> 2.95.x any more; even Debian stopped using it three and a half >> years ago. Should we keep this? >> > > Yes, we should keep this. Several OpenBSD platforms still use GCC 2.95.3. > > The OS that I am working with still uses the 2.95 compiler for the PPC. Please keep it in.