From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-27082-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 19097 invoked by alias); 8 Dec 2006 22:00:39 -0000
Received: (qmail 19086 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Dec 2006 22:00:35 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from de01egw02.freescale.net (HELO de01egw02.freescale.net) (192.88.165.103)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Dec 2006 22:00:27 +0000
Received: from de01smr01.freescale.net (de01smr01.freescale.net [10.208.0.31]) 	by de01egw02.freescale.net (8.12.11/de01egw02) with ESMTP id kB8MEjh8008922; 	Fri, 8 Dec 2006 15:14:45 -0700 (MST)
Received: from [10.82.23.23] (ld0034-tx32.am.freescale.net [10.82.23.23]) 	by de01smr01.freescale.net (8.13.1/8.13.0) with ESMTP id kB8M0FaR012287; 	Fri, 8 Dec 2006 16:00:15 -0600 (CST)
Message-ID: <4579E06F.9040205@freescale.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2006 22:00:00 -0000
From: Kishore Paul <kishorep@freescale.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
CC: gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: gdb remote serial protocol qC and vCont question
References: <4578B16D.3090404@freescale.com> <20061208013236.GA18882@nevyn.them.org> <4578CDF7.2000909@freescale.com> <20061208032856.GA21855@nevyn.them.org>
In-Reply-To: <20061208032856.GA21855@nevyn.them.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-12/txt/msg00068.txt.bz2

Daniel,

The T packet works and I am seeing the threads switching now.

Thanks,
Kishore

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

>On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 08:29:11PM -0600, Kishore Paul wrote:
>  
>
>>Received packet: [vCont;s:1;c]  -------------> (1)
>>....
>> < thread switch happens to 2 >
>>....
>><receives S05>
>>Received packet: [vCont;s:1;c]  -------------> (2)*
>>
>>
>>Between the first and second vCont packet the thread-id changes from 1 
>>to 2 but this information is somehow not getting communicated to gdb. 
>>The intent of the second vCont is to do a step for thread 2 and c for 
>>all other threads.
>>    
>>
>
>How do you expect GDB to know this if you aren't telling it?  It can't
>guess!
>
>The thing you're missing is the 'T' response and the "thread:" item in
>it.
>
>  
>