From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15006 invoked by alias); 7 Dec 2006 10:00:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 14928 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Dec 2006 10:00:33 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtagate4.de.ibm.com (HELO mtagate4.de.ibm.com) (195.212.29.153) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Dec 2006 10:00:24 +0000 Received: from d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.167.49]) by mtagate4.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kB7A0LJH061124 for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2006 10:00:21 GMT Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.165.228]) by d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/NCO v8.1.1) with ESMTP id kB7A0KO12670722 for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2006 11:00:20 +0100 Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id kB7A0KGX025841 for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2006 11:00:20 +0100 Received: from [9.152.248.39] (dyn-9-152-248-39.boeblingen.de.ibm.com [9.152.248.39]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id kB7A0KnH025798; Thu, 7 Dec 2006 11:00:20 +0100 Message-ID: <4577E632.9040304@de.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 10:00:00 -0000 From: Markus Deuling User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061107) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Brobecker CC: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: GDB 6.5.90 available for testing (GDB 6.6 pre-release) References: <20061202192351.GY3304@adacore.com> <45752271.2080501@de.ibm.com> <20061205185645.GT15038@adacore.com> <4576B13F.7030305@de.ibm.com> <20061206171836.GB10819@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <20061206171836.GB10819@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-12/txt/msg00056.txt.bz2 Joel Brobecker schrieb: >>>> Results: >>>> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-testers/2006-q4/msg00024.html >>> Did you compare that with the results obtained with GDB 6.5? >>> That would be an interesting datapoint. >>> >> I compared it with vanilla GDB 6.5 on powerpc with nearly the same results: >> >> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-testers/2006-q4/msg00025.html > > Thanks. It looks like there has not been any degradation in the quality > of that port, which is good. If you have some time in the future, > perhaps you can help fixing the issues that the testsuite is revealing > and improve the next release? ;-) > I will give it a try :-) Regards, Markus -- Markus Deuling GNU Toolchain for Linux on Cell BE deuling@de.ibm.com