From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18289 invoked by alias); 6 Dec 2006 12:02:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 18279 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Dec 2006 12:02:26 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtagate6.de.ibm.com (HELO mtagate6.de.ibm.com) (195.212.29.155) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Dec 2006 12:02:13 +0000 Received: from d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.167.49]) by mtagate6.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kB6C2AGD276220 for ; Wed, 6 Dec 2006 12:02:10 GMT Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.165.228]) by d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/NCO v8.1.1) with ESMTP id kB6C2A3x3018918 for ; Wed, 6 Dec 2006 13:02:10 +0100 Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id kB6C29BJ010699 for ; Wed, 6 Dec 2006 13:02:10 +0100 Received: from [9.152.248.39] (dyn-9-152-248-39.boeblingen.de.ibm.com [9.152.248.39]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id kB6C293P010679; Wed, 6 Dec 2006 13:02:09 +0100 Message-ID: <4576B13F.7030305@de.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 12:02:00 -0000 From: Markus Deuling User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061107) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Brobecker CC: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: GDB 6.5.90 available for testing (GDB 6.6 pre-release) References: <20061202192351.GY3304@adacore.com> <45752271.2080501@de.ibm.com> <20061205185645.GT15038@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <20061205185645.GT15038@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-12/txt/msg00051.txt.bz2 Hi Joel, Joel Brobecker schrieb: >> I build it on powerpc without problems. I think there are some >> regressions. Does not look that good at all. >> >> Results: >> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-testers/2006-q4/msg00024.html > > Did you compare that with the results obtained with GDB 6.5? > That would be an interesting datapoint. > I compared it with vanilla GDB 6.5 on powerpc with nearly the same results: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-testers/2006-q4/msg00025.html Regards, Markus -- Markus Deuling GNU Toolchain for Linux on Cell BE deuling@de.ibm.com