From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8481 invoked by alias); 12 Nov 2006 21:40:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 8469 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Nov 2006 21:40:51 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp10.hccnet.nl (HELO smtp10.hccnet.nl) (62.251.0.13) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Nov 2006 21:40:47 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.151] by smtp10.hccnet.nl via [80.100.236.49] with ESMTP for id kACLehZL016781 (8.13.6/2.05); Sun, 12 Nov 2006 22:40:44 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <455794DB.2080503@hccnet.nl> Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 21:40:00 -0000 From: Erik Leunissen User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: segfault References: <454F0CBD.1000903@hccnet.nl> <20061106133600.GA29547@nevyn.them.org> <4557902A.9020504@hccnet.nl> In-Reply-To: <4557902A.9020504@hccnet.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Status: Clean X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-11/txt/msg00081.txt.bz2 Erik Leunissen wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: >> >> Is s->filename NULL? >> > > It appears that segfaults occur in more programs/libraries on my system > since a week or so. These programs have in common that they were > compiled with a home-compiled upgrade of gcc-4.1.1. Gdb-6.4 was one of > the programs compiled with the upgraded compiler. > > I am now recompiling with the system supplied compiler (gcc-3.1.1). > Whether the segfault persists, I will report later. > > Erik Leunissen > ============= > > The segfault does not occur anymore with gdb-6.4 compiled by the system supplied compiler. Therefore, I attribute the observed segfault to a broken gcc-4.1.1 and not to gdb-6.4 Sorry for the noise. Erik.