From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-26789-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 20102 invoked by alias); 8 Nov 2006 00:56:04 -0000
Received: (qmail 20059 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2006 00:55:49 -0000
Received: from unknown (195.23.133.215)   by sourceware.org with QMTP; 8 Nov 2006 00:55:49 -0000
Received: (qmail 20680 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2006 00:55:48 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mailfrt07.isp.novis.pt) ([195.23.133.199])           (envelope-sender <pedro_alves@portugalmail.pt>)           by mailrly05.isp.novis.pt with compressed SMTP; 8 Nov 2006 00:55:48 -0000
Received: (qmail 32493 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2006 00:55:28 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([195.23.225.148])           (envelope-sender <pedro_alves@portugalmail.pt>)           by mailfrt07.isp.novis.pt with SMTP; 8 Nov 2006 00:55:28 -0000
Message-ID: <45512AF3.10509@portugalmail.pt>
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 00:56:00 -0000
From: Pedro Alves <pedro_alves@portugalmail.pt>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060909 Thunderbird/1.5.0.7 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Pedro Alves <pedro_alves@portugalmail.pt>
CC:  gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] MinGW and i386_pe_skip_trampoline_code
References: <455125A3.30304@portugalmail.pt>
In-Reply-To: <455125A3.30304@portugalmail.pt>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0646-2, 07-11-2006), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-11/txt/msg00034.txt.bz2

Pedro Alves wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just looking at PE support code, and I noticed that in 
> i386-cygwin-tdep.c,
> there is a call to set_gdbarch_skip_trampoline_code that will 
> eventually register
> i386_pe_skip_trampoline_code, defined in i386-tdep.c.
> From the looks of it, that function will skip 'import lib 
> stubs'/trampolines.
> I wonder why gdb for MinGW doesn't register it too? Probably an 
> oversight, no?
>
Err, maybe it is the other way around, and find_solib_trampoline_target 
should be enough for cygwin too?
Probably not important, though.

> Cheers,
> Pedro Alves
>
>