From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8702 invoked by alias); 2 Nov 2006 11:53:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 8693 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Nov 2006 11:53:00 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from fra-del-01.spheriq.net (HELO fra-del-01.spheriq.net) (195.46.51.97) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Nov 2006 11:52:46 +0000 Received: from fra-out-03.spheriq.net (fra-out-03.spheriq.net [195.46.51.131]) by fra-del-01.spheriq.net with ESMTP id kA2Bqgpb020880 for ; Thu, 2 Nov 2006 11:52:42 GMT Received: from fra-cus-02.spheriq.net (fra-cus-02.spheriq.net [195.46.51.38]) by fra-out-03.spheriq.net with ESMTP id kA2BqfFh024048 for ; Thu, 2 Nov 2006 11:52:41 GMT Received: from beta.dmz-eu.st.com (beta.dmz-eu.st.com [164.129.1.35]) by fra-cus-02.spheriq.net with ESMTP id kA2Bqfnf023270 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 2 Nov 2006 11:52:41 GMT Received: from zeta.dmz-eu.st.com (ns2.st.com [164.129.230.9]) by beta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id C1AAEDA41 for ; Thu, 2 Nov 2006 11:52:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail1.bri.st.com (mail1.bri.st.com [164.129.8.218]) by zeta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id 5DA43473B7 for ; Thu, 2 Nov 2006 11:52:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [164.129.15.13] (bri1043.bri.st.com [164.129.15.13]) by mail1.bri.st.com (MOS 3.5.8-GR) with ESMTP id CID88798 (AUTH stubbsa); Thu, 2 Nov 2006 11:52:35 GMT Message-ID: <4549DC03.60504@st.com> Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 11:53:00 -0000 From: Andrew STUBBS User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [rfc] "reset" / "create-inferior" commands References: <20061101202811.GA20484@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20061101202811.GA20484@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-11/txt/msg00009.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > [I would actually have picked "restart" over "reset", but that's taken for > checkpoints. We could still steal it and use "restart checkpoint 1" for > checkpoints, if others think restart is preferable to reset.] If the initial state is (or can be) considered a special checkpoint then this is what it should be. Otherwise the concepts, and therefore commands, should not be confused. Another possible name I haven't seen yet is 'launch'. Andrew