From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-26630-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 892 invoked by alias); 22 Oct 2006 12:18:51 -0000
Received: (qmail 882 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Oct 2006 12:18:50 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from nile.gnat.com (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 Oct 2006 12:18:48 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) 	by filtered-nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC09D48D32A; 	Sun, 22 Oct 2006 08:18:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from nile.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1])  by localhost (nile.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP  id 12749-01-5; Sun, 22 Oct 2006 08:18:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (nile.gnat.com [205.232.38.5]) 	by nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CF8348D2C8; 	Sun, 22 Oct 2006 08:18:46 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <453B61AD.7030605@adacore.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 12:18:00 -0000
From: Robert Dewar <dewar@adacore.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,  rodney.bates@wichita.edu,   gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: breakpoint for accessing memory location
References: <4537DBC6.1030807@hccnet.nl> <20061019201214.GA32332@nevyn.them.org> <4537DEDC.5000008@hccnet.nl> <u4ptzqz0b.fsf@gnu.org> <453A3758.5090602@wichita.edu> <ufydhpu0o.fsf@gnu.org> <20061021155125.GA9177@nevyn.them.org> <uejt1pdhp.fsf@gnu.org> <20061021223200.GA21012@nevyn.them.org> <u8xj9oufd.fsf@gnu.org> <20061022042230.GA28995@nevyn.them.org>
In-Reply-To: <20061022042230.GA28995@nevyn.them.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-10/txt/msg00192.txt.bz2

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

> I really don't think we should be optimizing expressions.  One
> certainly could be devised - but it would look like "fold" in GCC,
> which is a huge and horrendously complex thing.

And it would lead to surprising results, if you watch p-p and p is
out of scope, it would be surprising if it did NOT lead to an error!
>