From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13828 invoked by alias); 29 Sep 2006 20:09:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 13819 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Sep 2006 20:09:56 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp1.dnsmadeeasy.com (HELO smtp1.dnsmadeeasy.com) (205.234.170.134) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 20:09:53 +0000 Received: from smtp1.dnsmadeeasy.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.dnsmadeeasy.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4386CBE839; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 16:09:51 -0400 (EDT) X-Authenticated-Name: js.dnsmadeeasy X-Transit-System: In case of SPAM please contact abuse@dnsmadeeasy.com Received: from avtrex.com (unknown [67.116.42.147]) by smtp1.dnsmadeeasy.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 16:09:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.7.26] ([192.168.7.26]) by avtrex.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:09:53 -0700 Message-ID: <451D7D8D.7020802@avtrex.com> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 20:09:00 -0000 From: David Daney User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc3 (X11/20050929) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: dwarf2-frame vs set_loc References: <20060928224245.GA21955@nevyn.them.org> <20060929193344.GD1626@adacore.com> <20060929193704.GA30056@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20060929193704.GA30056@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-09/txt/msg00193.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 12:33:44PM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote: > >>What's the status at the compiler level, by the way? Still backed out? >>If this is the case, I might have to work a bit harder to still be able >>to reproduce the problem, because the compiler I have access to is >>rebuilt nightly. I should have made a copy of the compiler :-/. > > > Still backed out; presumably going to stay that way, since Jakub made > some entirely correct points about why this is a bad idea. > That is not quite accurate. The original patch (r 116604) is still in place. An additional patch (r 117114) was applied to correct most of the problems with the original patch. David Daney.