From: Brendan Kehoe <brendan@zen.org>
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: cont vs run -- the real deal
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 16:29:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44AD3A4E.3020105@zen.org> (raw)
Does there exist in writing an explanation of why "run" works for native
programs and "target sim" targets, but "cont" is the correct approach
for "target remote ..." ? The docs I'm able to see, and the sources for
the various stubs and infcmd.c all seem to leave it implied somehow.
Thanks,
B
next reply other threads:[~2006-07-06 16:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-06 16:29 Brendan Kehoe [this message]
2006-07-06 16:34 ` Paul Koning
2006-07-06 16:47 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44AD3A4E.3020105@zen.org \
--to=brendan@zen.org \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox