From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27911 invoked by alias); 5 Jun 2006 21:02:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 27902 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Jun 2006 21:02:50 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Jun 2006 21:02:49 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k55L2lnA022528 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 17:02:47 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k55L2gPB031071 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 17:02:42 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (sebastian-int.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.221]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k55L2f0m026574 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 17:02:42 -0400 Message-ID: <44849BF0.8000105@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 21:02:00 -0000 From: Keith Seitz User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: V850E simulator, assembler single-step never returns?!? References: <200606052145.25672.tmohr@s.netic.de> <20060605204208.GA32699@nevyn.them.org> <448497BC.5020907@redhat.com> <20060605205045.GA691@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20060605205045.GA691@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-06/txt/msg00027.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > Yes, that works too :-) I say this because insight is really stupid. It really doesn't know much about targets, other than the semantics of "target FOO BAR". Okay, that's not true. There is one place that I recall where Insight knows more about the target than gdb. That is (oddly enough) with the V850 and the ICE that NEC has. But fortunately, the simulator is being used here. > (In this particular case, I don't know exactly what the Insight button > used corresponds to - whether it is e.g. stepi or nexti. I'd guess > stepi?) Yeah, the insight execution buttons (run, step, stepi, next, nexti, finish, continue) map one-to-one with gdb commands. We do change run a little bit, but it eventually either maps to run or continue, depending on the target configuration database built into insight. Keith