From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24332 invoked by alias); 22 Mar 2006 22:08:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 24318 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Mar 2006 22:08:35 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 22:08:33 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k2MM7Nhu010007; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 17:07:23 -0500 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k2MM7NnW027936; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 17:07:23 -0500 Received: from [172.16.50.102] (vpn50-102.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.102]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k2MM7NOO014624; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 17:07:23 -0500 Message-ID: <4421CB23.6000207@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 22:50:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050929) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gdb@sourceware.org, Jim Blandy Subject: Re: bugzilla vs gnats (nee dejagnu :-) References: <440C8C46.4000400@redhat.com> <20060306193058.GA11100@nevyn.them.org> <20060306200424.GA12242@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20060306200424.GA12242@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-03/txt/msg00158.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 08:59:34PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote: > >>Daniel Jacobowitz writes: >> >> >>>I still want it to happen. But I don't think anyone had decided what >>>to do about all the GNATS PR numbers in DejaGNU; we could preserve >>>them, but only by setting up a separate bugzilla installation, instead >>>of sharing with the rest of sourceware (and I think sharing the >>>installation would be in our best interests). >> >>Currently the highest GNATS PR number for gdb is 2096, which is much lower >>than the highest PR number in the sourceware bugzilla, so it we would just >>have to document that PR numbers < x refer to GNATS, everything else to >>bugzilla. > > > Yes, that is probably the best way. > Jim, this is the thread I was refering to, I think the only potential question left here is gcc or sourceware (I'm guessing sourceware but it never hurts to put the question). Andrew