From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13324 invoked by alias); 18 Feb 2006 17:28:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 13315 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Feb 2006 17:28:31 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from ip127.bb146.pacific.net.hk (HELO mailhub.stlglobal.com) (202.64.146.127) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 17:28:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.stlglobal.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1FAVsA-0002wv-Sz; Sun, 19 Feb 2006 01:27:54 +0800 Message-ID: <43F7592D.40901@tausq.org> Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 17:42:00 -0000 From: Randolph Chung User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20051002) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz CC: msnyder@redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: "run", and executable file/symtab association? References: <20060215030909.GB8700@nevyn.them.org> <43F6EEB4.4040002@tausq.org> <20060218152827.GA21241@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20060218152827.GA21241@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-02/txt/msg00239.txt.bz2 > pop_target calls current_target->to_close. I am suspecting that it > should call target_stack->to_close instead. hrm, target_stack is "child", and its to_close method is NULL. target_stack->beneath is "exec" and its to_close is exec_close... >>I don't pretend to understand this code and why if there are forks, we >>should be popping the target to kill everything. > I don't either. ok, I'll wait for Michael to respond :) randolph