From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32341 invoked by alias); 24 Jan 2006 18:11:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 32333 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Jan 2006 18:11:08 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from brmea-mail-4.Sun.COM (HELO brmea-mail-4.sun.com) (192.18.98.36) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Jan 2006 18:11:07 +0000 Received: from phys-mpk-1 ([129.146.11.81]) by brmea-mail-4.sun.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id k0OIB1uh019446 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2006 11:11:02 -0700 (MST) Received: from conversion-daemon.mpk-mail1.sfbay.sun.com by mpk-mail1.sfbay.sun.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.24 (built Dec 19 2003)) id <0ITL00601Z71PV@mpk-mail1.sfbay.sun.com> (original mail from Olatunji.Ruwase@Sun.COM) for gdb@sourceware.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2006 10:11:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from Sun.COM (ruwase.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.78.63]) by mpk-mail1.sfbay.sun.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.24 (built Dec 19 2003)) with ESMTP id <0ITL00MLXZTRS5@mpk-mail1.sfbay.sun.com>; Tue, 24 Jan 2006 10:10:39 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 18:19:00 -0000 From: Olatunji Ruwase Subject: Re: Debugging on v8plus In-reply-to: <20060124162949.GA18951@nevyn.them.org> To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Reply-to: Olatunji.Ruwase@Sun.COM Message-id: <43D66D9F.5020408@Sun.COM> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS sun4u; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20041214 References: <43D652B5.5060302@Sun.COM> <20060124162949.GA18951@nevyn.them.org> Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-01/txt/msg00240.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote On 01/24/06 08:29,: > On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 08:15:49AM -0800, Olatunji Ruwase wrote: > >>Hello, >> I imagine that this issue has been discussed in the past, but I ve been >>unable to find much information searching through the archives. So >>pardon me for asking, but I m curious as to why there is no gdb support >>for debugging v8plus applications (i.e 64 bit registers in a 32 bit >>environment). Is it because this isnt important to users ?. Or is there >>some other technical reason ?. >>In other words will a patch for this support be accepted into gdb ?. > > > Presumably it would be, if someone was interested in implementing it > (along with filing an FSF copyright assignment). > Daniel, I m interested in doing this work. Can I contact you directly with questions I might while doing this ? Thanks tunji