From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16850 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2006 13:43:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 16840 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Jan 2006 13:43:40 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from province.act-europe.fr (HELO province.act-europe.fr) (212.157.227.214) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 13:43:39 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-province.act-europe.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 955F84ACE3; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 14:42:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from province.act-europe.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (province.act-europe.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 39024-06; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 14:42:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.10.0.210] (salonique.act-europe.fr [10.10.0.210]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by province.act-europe.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 250534ACE4; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 14:42:41 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43CBA0D7.3000903@adacore.com> Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 13:43:00 -0000 From: Cyrille Comar User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz CC: Paul Koning , hilfingr@gnat.com, gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: : Re: [RFC] multiple breakpoints from FILE:LINE References: <43C9AAA8.2030605@adacore.com> <17354.31047.417000.385481@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <20060115164459.GA5390@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20060115164459.GA5390@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-01/txt/msg00140.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > I've yet to see a compelling reason to break on one constructor and not > the other. Most users don't even know the difference between when each > is called. I am not familiar at all with C++ debugging, so the situation is not clear to me: To break on constructors, do you use the FILE:LINE of the class? Wouldn't that break on destructors as well? (or any other type specific implicit operation, if such thing exists in C++)