From: Anthony Heading <ajrh@ajrh.net>
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: debugging shared libraries
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 14:12:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43BD291F.4030804@ajrh.net> (raw)
Hello,
Happy New Year to all.
I know this is an old question, but (probably in a bout of
fresh New Year optimism) I hopefully tried the following:
~% gdb y.so
GNU gdb 6.4-debian
Copyright 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
[...]
(gdb) break my_buggy_shared_library_function()
Breakpoint 1 at 0x792: file y.cpp, line 5.
(gdb) run my_executable
Starting program: /home/ajrh/y.so my_executable
Breakpoint 1 at 0x80000792: file y.cpp, line 5.
warning: shared library handler failed to enable breakpoint
Command syntax aside, can GDB really not DWIM? Starting
GDB on the .so seems like the right thing to do: the
tab-completion etc on the function names works to
get breakpoints set up, etc. But if the debug target is a
shared library then I probably need to run a different
executable to get the process started.
(gdb) help file
Use FILE as program to be debugged.
It is read for its symbols, for getting the contents of pure memory,
and it is the program executed when you use the `run' command.
Equivalently, I think, do these two properties really need
to be hardwired together?
For reference, I think this works to my gratification in
MS Visual Studio on Win32: if you try to debug a DLL, the
program prompts to ask which executable you'd like to start.
Regards
Anthony
next reply other threads:[~2006-01-05 14:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-05 14:12 Anthony Heading [this message]
2006-01-05 14:17 Kris Warkentin
2006-01-06 1:37 ` Anthony Heading
2006-01-06 8:10 ` Jim Blandy
2006-01-06 14:56 ` Anthony Heading
2006-01-06 19:06 ` Jim Blandy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43BD291F.4030804@ajrh.net \
--to=ajrh@ajrh.net \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox