From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6210 invoked by alias); 9 Dec 2005 17:51:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 6198 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Dec 2005 17:51:36 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from kleinhenz.com (HELO kleinhenz.com) (213.239.205.196) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 17:51:34 +0000 Received: from [192.168.115.35] (p54995E75.dip.t-dialin.net [84.153.94.117]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Simon Richter", Issuer "Kleinhenz Elektronik CA" (verified OK)) by kleinhenz.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DE164A8003; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 18:51:31 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4399C41D.1010802@hogyros.de> Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 17:51:00 -0000 From: Simon Richter User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051019) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: Mark Mitchell , Richard Earnshaw , GDB Subject: Re: ARM RDI References: <438B8FAD.1020804@codesourcery.com> <1133259214.32658.36.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> <20051129134436.GA22387@nevyn.them.org> <438C6192.10109@hogyros.de> <20051129142714.GA23172@nevyn.them.org> <438C95BF.10109@codesourcery.com> <20051129180326.GA29028@nevyn.them.org> <20051209172347.GA16076@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20051209172347.GA16076@nevyn.them.org> OpenPGP: url=http://www.hogyros.de/simon.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigCD3EFAC8155972B68EFE467B" X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2005-12/txt/msg00100.txt.bz2 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigCD3EFAC8155972B68EFE467B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-length: 366 Hi, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > Only Simon objected, and I haven't seen a reply to either Richard's or > my responses to him. I was fully content with the answer, as my objection was based on the belief that functional code was to be removed because RDI was declared obsolete, not because rdi-share was broken and unused. So removal is fine with me. Simon --------------enigCD3EFAC8155972B68EFE467B Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" Content-length: 307 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iQCVAwUBQ5nEHVYr4CN7gCINAQKUAAP/fYgUlB99HygiPc8Bwfrl+9NBDFmIWJpM 5bwsJ7CVRYqFb0C0vLxdIoegz2DXju18qoSS4BE6JPCsl/c/vu7Vbm3f8rhUxJRg yd52Vq444UYJyUEf8K2iWUNBYrF1Jl7WGhE7bVpux/9eVpL7E0AR59b+2LvCrFeh HFFoGu70Nvg= =Lecn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigCD3EFAC8155972B68EFE467B--