From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5622 invoked by alias); 21 Oct 2005 15:46:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 5589 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Oct 2005 15:46:17 -0000 Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (HELO xproxy.gmail.com) (66.249.82.195) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 15:46:17 +0000 Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s12so316683wxc for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 08:46:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.50.3 with SMTP id x3mr1844646wxx; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 08:46:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.2? ( [81.202.175.227]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id h7sm4694181wxd.2005.10.21.08.46.14; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 08:46:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <43590D36.60608@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 15:46:00 -0000 From: ".:SB:." User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc3 (X11/20050929) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Suitable DDD release to be used with GDB release 4.18 OpenPGP: id=980CAD8A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005-10/txt/msg00124.txt.bz2 Hi all Just finished some modifs to gdb 4.18 source regarding support for ARC systems and i'm going to test that modified gdb is usable with ddd and wondering which is the correct version to try for ddd, i mean, which version of ddd is best suited for gdb 4.18. Help and hints appreciated J.J. -- Linux goliathbox.dyndns.org 2.6.12-1.1378_FC3 i686 GNU/Linux 17:40:01 up 6 days, 22:26, 5 users, load average: 0.78, 0.74, 2.65 --------------------------------------------------------- Baruch's Observation: If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.