From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15867 invoked by alias); 6 Dec 2001 21:41:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15784 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2001 21:41:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO frigg.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.16) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 6 Dec 2001 21:41:25 -0000 Received: from zaretsky ([192.116.55.139]) by frigg.inter.net.il (Mirapoint) with ESMTP id BCA66336; Thu, 6 Dec 2001 23:40:53 +0200 (IST) Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2001 13:41:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: drow@mvista.com Message-Id: <4331-Thu06Dec2001234004+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> X-Mailer: emacs 21.1.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 CC: gdb@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20011206155526.A11800@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Thu, 6 Dec 2001 15:55:26 -0500) Subject: Re: RFC: Formatting of type output Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20011206120205.A1278@nevyn.them.org> <1659-Thu06Dec2001224222+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <20011206155526.A11800@nevyn.them.org> X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00068.txt.bz2 > Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 15:55:26 -0500 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > > > > Could you please post a few examples how they are different? It's > > hard to reason about this without seeing some live examples; I guess > > I don't know enough about this problem to figure this out myself. > > Well, here's an example [...] Thanks, it's quite clear now. FWIW, I don't think this change could annoy users, and the probability of other programs depending on the precise format is quite low.