From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8956 invoked by alias); 23 Jun 2005 23:56:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 7852 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Jun 2005 23:54:42 -0000 Received: from cumulus.netspace.net.au (HELO mail.netspace.net.au) (203.10.110.72) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 23:54:42 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.11] (220-253-61-32.VIC.netspace.net.au [220.253.61.32]) by mail.netspace.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4293B7272A for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 09:54:38 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <42BB4CD2.90708@netspace.net.au> Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 23:56:00 -0000 From: Russell Shaw User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050513 Debian/1.7.8-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Cross-debugging interfaces known to still work? References: <42BB3CD4.30707@apple.com> In-Reply-To: <42BB3CD4.30707@apple.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg00219.txt.bz2 Stan Shebs wrote: > In digging through GDB sources trying to figure out which internal > APIs are OK for Apple's port (yes, yes, need to contribute :-) ), > I see that a number of the oddball-protocol remote interfaces > probably no longer work, and some, such as remote-mips.c, are going > unnoticed because they're not built into any config anymore. At the > same time, I'm not seeing very much mail traffic on anything besides > standard remote protocol, sim, and RDI for Arm. > > So my question is, do we have any information about who is actually > using or testing any of these other targets, either with current or > older versions of GDBs? > > Stan The "odd" protocols are used for adapting gdb to control a hardware ICE. I made one for an atmel avr ICE, but it's not maintained in the gdb sources yet.